Tammi, a 19 year old waitress at a local restaurant I often
frequent, was complaining of a headache.
I shared with her a
remedy I once learned that sounds rather odd but has worked
amazingly well for everyone with whom I've shared it - cutting
a cold lime in half and rubbing the juicy part all over your
forehead.
I don't know why it works, but it does. (Then again, I
don't know why the lights go on when I flip on the light switch, but I do it anyway because it works!)
Well, Tammi is the type who generally doesn't believe anything
so, when I made the suggestion, she laughed and waved the idea
away with her hand.
Now, Tammi's a real good kid and I hated to see her suffer
needlessly with a headache. My initial "reaction" was to say,
in aggravated voice, "Tammi, what have you got to lose -- just
try it!"
Tell me though, had I done that, do you think it would have
worked? Would she have said, "Oh, Bob, what a great idea. Just
try it. Why didn't I think of that?"
We both know the odds are about 99.9 percent she would not
have. Instead, she would have remained resistant to the idea.
So, I didn't say anything...and waited for another opportunity.
About five minutes later, as she was refilling my water glass
she said, "It's funny, I once heard of this great cure for the
hiccups which really works. All you do is...." and she told me
what it was.
(Come to think of it, I don't remember what the cure was. I do
remember that it sounded even stranger than rubbing the juicy
part of a lime over your forehead to relieve a headache!)
So, how should I respond?
Now was my opportunity. And there were various potential
responses, both helpful and non-helpful. Let's analyze a few of
them.
Choice #1:
"Well, Tammi, why would you believe something foolish like
that instead of what I told you about the lime?"
While this is
the natural response, it certainly won't cause the desired
action. It's attacking the person's ego and saying, "I should
be listened to but you shouldn't be."
Choice #2:
"I'll tell you what; you try the lime right now and next
time I have the hiccups, I'll try your idea." Though a little
better than #1, it's still patronizing and is self ego-based.
Not likely to be effective. More likely to elicit a polite
laugh from the other person but no desired action.
Choice #3:
After listening to her suggestion very attentively, I
said, "Wow, what a neat idea. I'll definitely try that next
time I get the hiccups. Thank you." Of course, that is what I
actually said to her and her response was, "You know what, let
me go find a lime and see if it works" (which she did....and
it did).
Why did #3 work when we all know that the first two probably
would not have?
A matter of respect
As usual, it was mainly a matter of showing another person the
proper respect; treating them as a responsible, self-directing
individual with an ability to make the best decision for
herself.
And, there was one more thing. Instead of trying to
proactively persuade her to my way of thinking, I held back
(not always easy to do) and allowed her to come to her own
conclusion. Her suggestion to me merely allowed me to
demonstrate to her that that is what I was doing.
Sometimes it's simply necessary to use positive detachment and
allow ourselves to not have to have the answer; to not have
to "actively persuade." In time - hopefully sooner but
sometimes later - that person, seeing and sensing the respect
we've given them, will be more open to our suggestion.
Yes, sometimes the most effective way to persuade someone, is
not "persuade" at all.