Several years ago, when President Bush attempted to persuade
people of the need to privatize Social Security, his attempt
didn't just fail, it failed miserably. And by the way, this has
nothing to do with whether you live in a blue state or red
state, or what your own views are on this administration, or
Social Security, or anything else -- it's purely about how the
point was communicated.
So, why did it fail? Two huge reasons - in my opinion only, of
course - were that his explanation was based on a premise that
is somewhat difficult to understand, and that the way he
explained that premise was totally "unmoving."
He said, "We need to move back to an "ownership society."
An "ownership society." What does that mean to most people?
Pretty much nothing; it's just a term, a concept, two words put
together.
Oh, there were some explanations of the benefits of
an "ownership society," but certainly nothing gripping or
inspiring. Only those who had studied the issue would have
understood what he meant, and many of them already agreed with
him.
To most people, "Ownership Society" is vague; not concrete.
It
paints no picture, there's nothing to grasp onto there with
emotion. (And, since people act on emotion, that's a huge part
of the persuasion process.) Because of that, each individual
will interpret the phrase based on their own belief system.
| The term
didn't create a connection with people - and neither did the
president's message |
The president left the meaning of the term totally to chance.
In essence, it was up to everyone listening to define the term
based on their own belief system. Because of this, the term
didn't create a connection with people - and neither did the
president's message.
What could President Bush have done to frame his position in a
way most people could understand and emotionally grasp it?
Perhaps he could have used the well-known economist's phrase,
"Nobody washes a rental car." When we don't own something, we
don't tend to treat it as well as if we did own it.
Once when I was at an airport, I decided to find out if that
saying was true (which, I suspected it was). I approached the
two women behind the counter at a popular rental car agency,
told them I was doing some research, and asked (in such a way
as to not give away the response I was looking for), "What
percentage of people would you say bring back their rental car
washed?"
They laughed. They laughed some more. They continued to laugh.
I thought, "Hmm, maybe it's my smooth delivery." :-) It
wasn't. They said they were continually amazed at how horribly
the customers treat their rental cars. One woman added, "People
would never treat their own cars this way."
Exactly! And most people intuitively understand that.
And if
the president had used that kind of word picture, perhaps more
people would have felt compelled or moved in some way by his
message.
In the persuasion process it's important to present your point
in a way that allows your listener to clearly understand your
point in the way you choose it to be understood, and to grasp
it in such a way that the odds of change are vastly improved.
To do this effectively, first make sure to use a correct
example, and then paint easy-to-grasp pictures that allow
people to genuinely understand the concept you're explaining.